1080p HDTV and the Westinghouse LVM-37w3Posted by Andy Atkinson on July 5, 2006 | Post type: Gain High-definition television has been rolling out across the United States over the last several years, slowly penetrating the US television market. My experience is that the average US Midwest consumer finds the monthly cost of HD programming from cable companies like Comcast to be quite expensive, and the content that is available in high-definition sparse. Over-the-air (OTA) tuners offer a few channels of HD programming for free, but reception is limited to metropolitan markets and programming is often limited to only a handful of channels. Television is not the only type of content that can utilize the extra resolution of high-definition displays however. Computers have been operating at higher resolutions than television almost as long as they've existed. Now that traditional, living-room televisions are capable of displaying higher-resolution content, convergence between computer and television displays is happening among certain display technologies like LCDs. The LED Westinghouse logo can be turned off (glows blue) Remote has useful features like dedicated input buttons, and a button to cycle through backlight brightness levels HDTV purists will argue that high-definition starts at 1080p. The "p" stands for progressive and simply means there are actually 1080 (in this case) horizontal lines of resolution. Nearly every HDTV that is available in the US market as of July 2006 however operates at a lower resolution than this, generally "720p" or 720 lines of resolution. Simply put, this resolution is not sufficient for computer usage. In addition to be being "blessed" by HDTV purists, a 1080p display offers enough resolution to be used as a computer display. So what options are available at your typical electronics store (Best Buy) in the 1080p display technology department? At the time of this writing, the enormous and expensive US $3000+ Sony SXRD series of rear-projection displays, sized at 50" and above, weighing 100 pounds or more, count as one option. Is there anything else that is thinner, lighter, less expensive, and still offers 1080p resolution? Enter the Westinghouse LVM-37w3. Unreal Tournament 2003 demonstrating the 4:3 pulldown Priced at US $1500 or lower, the <50 pound 37" 1080p LCD offers some impressive statistics, such as 8ms response time and 550cd/m^2. Translation? The panel is very bright, far brighter than most computer monitors out there, and offers 8ms response time, which is fast enough to show no visible ghosting or other artifacts in games like Unreal Tournament (I tested this myself with UT2003). The Westinghouse LVM-37w3 is a fairly attractive panel, it's no Apple Cinema Display, but there are some nice design elements, like down-firing speakers to eliminate visible front speaker grills, and Westinghouse chose to keep the depth of the stand and display minimal (around 6 inches in reality). What consumers will find most useful however, in my opinion, is the plethora of inputs. There are (2) DVI inputs (that are HDCP compatible for Windows Vista), (1) HDMI input, as well as a number of component, composite, S-Video and even an RGB input. I've got a DVI to HDMI cable that was cheap (around US $15) that would allow me to hook up any possible combination of cable tuner, receiver, DVD player, computer, laptop, Xbox, digital camera, etc., that I could think of. The Westinghouse LVM-37w3 is the smallest 1080p display available at the time of this writing. Note that computer monitors, such as the 24" Dell 2407WFP are capable of displaying 1080p resolution (and even higher resolutions), but are marketed as computer displays first, and HDTVs second (if at all). Given this knowledge then, it's clear that the space that separates HDTVs and computer monitors is dwindling. Read the LVM-37w3 tech specs at westinghouse.com DVD movies look great, can't wait for high-definition moves, HD-DVD or Blu Ray. Pixel count between displaysLet's examine the pixel count and price of a number of 16:9 and 16:10 displays that are capable of a minimum of 1080p resolution. Dell generally provides high-quality displays at lower prices than competitors like Samsung, Viewsonic, and Apple.
Note that at the time of this writing, in the 23" to 50" display products marketed as televisions on Dell.com, Dell does not offer a 1080p display, instead offering at best a "720p" display operating at a native resolution of 1366x768, or 1,049,088, or over 1 million pixels less of resolution from a 1080p display. For another treat, Microsoft has released a series of short video clips, some available in true 1080p (1920x1080) resolution, to be a HDTV showcase. The screens below show some scenes from the IMAX "Speed" movie. Above: Clips from IMAX Speed presentation in 1080p on Windows HD Showcase Between the three options presented above, the Westinghouse LVM-37w3 represents the best mix of price, size, and resolution. The fact that it maintains fast pixel refresh rates (8ms), has a plethora of inputs, and very high brightness levels, means the Westinghouse LVM-37w3 should go on your short list if you are in the market for a new 1080p high-definition display for your living room or your computer. About the author(s)Andy started Pain in the Tech in 2005 as a way to share tips and tutorials with friends and family, and evangelize great products and services. By 2008, Pain in the Tech had 7 contributors, thousands of daily page views. Site ownership was transitioned to Matt Thommes in 2008. Comments
|
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4089
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4141
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4142
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4164
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4165
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4167
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4237
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4258
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4259
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4286
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4302
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4318
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4319
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4323
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4334
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4341
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4417
TTIP.me/1998
Quick Link to this comment: http://TTIP.me/c4043